I can hire one half of the working class to kill the other half.
- Jay Gould
Killing the Poor Part
One
The high concept at the
heart of The Purge franchise is that following economic collapse, a
new political party has taken control of the United States on a platform of
ending crime. The New Founding Fathers (NFF) have ripped off an old Star Trek
episode and instituted a sort of festival where all crime is legal for one
night a year. The politicians are, obviously, exempted. You aren’t
allowed to kill your Senator.
Over the course of five
films and a TV series, The Purge has mutated from a clever home-invasion horror
into Swiftian political satire with very ragged teeth.
American Fascism is on
the rise, and the NFF bears a striking resemblance to Trump’s GOP. The NFF
scapegoats immigrants, the poor and other groups. They use fear and overblown
rhetoric about crime to gain power, then wield that power like a chainsaw.
The value of purge night
is multifoliate to the ruling class. It's population control (side note,
tech bros all seem to harbor Malthusian philosophies); it keeps the poors in
line; it’s entertainment of the Roman Coliseum variety. (another side
note: the makers of these films seem to grossly underestimate just what a major
problem fire would be in the purge. All cities should probably burn completely
on the first purge night).
There has been much
discussion about the philosophy of the Purge series and some of it is
questionable. For instance, the first film (The
Purge) has been held out as an example of the “inquiring murderer”
objection to Kant’s Categorical Imperative. For those playing along at home,
the TLDR here is that Kant argues that lying is always ethically wrong ("Act only according to that maxim whereby you can, at the same time, will that
it should become a universal law.") The objection asks you to
imagine that an innocent person being pursued by a killer has taken refuge in
your house. The killer appears and asks you if their intended victim is there.
If you answer truthfully, the innocent will be killed. This objection is unanswerable. I question its use in discussing The Purge, as
the scenarios on offer don’t really line up here. While Deontology fails, it is
unclear that this is the best way to demolish it.
A better discussion around these movies can he
had by considering Utilitarianism.
The Purge could be used as an objection to
Bentham’s Utilitarian ethics. Consider that the masked murderers causing mayhem
on purge night are akin to a Utility Monster. That is, a creature that gets so
much pleasure from causing pain, that it outweighs the pain caused. If the purgers enjoy their acts enough, then
those acts are actually moral.
Comments
Post a Comment